- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 18:30, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
Bentra Golf Course
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Bentra Golf Course ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable golf course. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:20, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Golf-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:20, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:20, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. A quick search for sources which may establish notability (under WP:SIGCOV) returns only directory style and TripAdvisor style listings. Which confirm that this small 9-hole pay-to-play municipal golf course and mini-golf facility does exist. But which do not establish notability. I'm not sure if there is a golf-course specific notability criteria, but notwithstanding WP:GNG, if a golf course had played host to a major international (or even national) competition, then that might help contribute to notability. As there would have been coverage of that. But I'm not finding anything. The overtly promotional tone is also concerning. And, while that could be addressed, if we take away all that bumf ("lush green land and stunning views", "renowned golf course architect", "stunning countryside views", "tranquil and idyllic", etc) there is nothing left of value. In short: delete. As WP:PROMO which doesn't meet WP:GNG. Guliolopez ( talk) 09:32, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 18:30, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
Bentra Golf Course
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Bentra Golf Course ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable golf course. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:20, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Golf-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:20, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:20, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. A quick search for sources which may establish notability (under WP:SIGCOV) returns only directory style and TripAdvisor style listings. Which confirm that this small 9-hole pay-to-play municipal golf course and mini-golf facility does exist. But which do not establish notability. I'm not sure if there is a golf-course specific notability criteria, but notwithstanding WP:GNG, if a golf course had played host to a major international (or even national) competition, then that might help contribute to notability. As there would have been coverage of that. But I'm not finding anything. The overtly promotional tone is also concerning. And, while that could be addressed, if we take away all that bumf ("lush green land and stunning views", "renowned golf course architect", "stunning countryside views", "tranquil and idyllic", etc) there is nothing left of value. In short: delete. As WP:PROMO which doesn't meet WP:GNG. Guliolopez ( talk) 09:32, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.