- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 14:10, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
Bentoism
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Bentoism ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It is WP:TOOSOON for an article on this WP:NEOLOGISM, which was introduced in a book, This Could be Our Future, published less than a year ago (in October 2019). The subject is only discussed at length in the publications and website by the author and in articles that are part of the book-launch publicity blitz. In other words, there is insufficient notability, and the existence of a Wikipedia article gives the appearance that the term is much more widely used and discussed than it really is. Biogeographist ( talk) 21:17, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Biogeographist ( talk) 21:17, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Biogeographist ( talk) 21:17, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:OR, WP:NEO, and WP:SIGCOV. We do not publish original research, nor are we Urban Dictionary. There is a single reliable source that is not by the author - an article in GQ. That does not satisfy significant coverage by any means. Bearian ( talk) 19:50, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: There are other mainstream sources not cited in the article, beyond what Bearian mentioned, but as I said above they are all part of the book-launch publicity blitz: essentially PR. Biogeographist ( talk) 20:01, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 14:10, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
Bentoism
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Bentoism ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It is WP:TOOSOON for an article on this WP:NEOLOGISM, which was introduced in a book, This Could be Our Future, published less than a year ago (in October 2019). The subject is only discussed at length in the publications and website by the author and in articles that are part of the book-launch publicity blitz. In other words, there is insufficient notability, and the existence of a Wikipedia article gives the appearance that the term is much more widely used and discussed than it really is. Biogeographist ( talk) 21:17, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Biogeographist ( talk) 21:17, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Biogeographist ( talk) 21:17, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:OR, WP:NEO, and WP:SIGCOV. We do not publish original research, nor are we Urban Dictionary. There is a single reliable source that is not by the author - an article in GQ. That does not satisfy significant coverage by any means. Bearian ( talk) 19:50, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: There are other mainstream sources not cited in the article, beyond what Bearian mentioned, but as I said above they are all part of the book-launch publicity blitz: essentially PR. Biogeographist ( talk) 20:01, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.