- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE. -- MelanieN ( talk) 02:54, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Ben Nicholls
- Ben Nicholls ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't appear to meet criteria for wp:politician. Haminoon ( talk) 11:16, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Absolutely fails wp:politician and nothing else in the article suggests any other criterion for notability. Closest might be connection with the drama group, but I suspect that it would be the group that qualified for the article, not the individual that founded it. And the article is factually incorrect: he is not the the "Parliamentary candidate", since no election has been called and nominations have not closed! He is a prospective parliamentary candidate. Emeraude ( talk) 14:12, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA 1000 19:13, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA 1000 19:13, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- Being an as yet unelected candidate in a forthcoming election is not a claim of notability that gets a person into Wikipedia — if you cannot properly source that he already passed a Wikipedia inclusion rule for other things before he was named a candidate, then he has to win the election, not merely run in it, to become notable enough. But that hasn't been demonstrated here — we don't even have an article about RicNic itself, for one thing. Delete, without prejudice against recreation in May if he wins. Bearcat ( talk) 23:32, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE. -- MelanieN ( talk) 02:54, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Ben Nicholls
- Ben Nicholls ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't appear to meet criteria for wp:politician. Haminoon ( talk) 11:16, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Absolutely fails wp:politician and nothing else in the article suggests any other criterion for notability. Closest might be connection with the drama group, but I suspect that it would be the group that qualified for the article, not the individual that founded it. And the article is factually incorrect: he is not the the "Parliamentary candidate", since no election has been called and nominations have not closed! He is a prospective parliamentary candidate. Emeraude ( talk) 14:12, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA 1000 19:13, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA 1000 19:13, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- Being an as yet unelected candidate in a forthcoming election is not a claim of notability that gets a person into Wikipedia — if you cannot properly source that he already passed a Wikipedia inclusion rule for other things before he was named a candidate, then he has to win the election, not merely run in it, to become notable enough. But that hasn't been demonstrated here — we don't even have an article about RicNic itself, for one thing. Delete, without prejudice against recreation in May if he wins. Bearcat ( talk) 23:32, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.