- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Belknap Lookout. ✗ plicit 11:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Belknap Hill ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No refs on the page for many years and the content reads in a particularly unenyclopedic way. I don't see why the contents couldn't be merged to Belknap Lookout but it doesn't seem like a redirect is necessary as a search will find the other page. JMWt ( talk) 09:50, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. JMWt ( talk) 09:50, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:53, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy redirect or merge. Just do that
WP:BOLD, easier than expecting other people to comment on what seems obvious to me as well, nothing wrong with leaving a redirect.
Reywas92
Talk
13:45, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- That probably makes sense as Belknap Hill appears to be in Belknap Lookout. Crouch, Swale ( talk) 18:15, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Belknap Lookout. ✗ plicit 11:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Belknap Hill ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No refs on the page for many years and the content reads in a particularly unenyclopedic way. I don't see why the contents couldn't be merged to Belknap Lookout but it doesn't seem like a redirect is necessary as a search will find the other page. JMWt ( talk) 09:50, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. JMWt ( talk) 09:50, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:53, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy redirect or merge. Just do that
WP:BOLD, easier than expecting other people to comment on what seems obvious to me as well, nothing wrong with leaving a redirect.
Reywas92
Talk
13:45, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- That probably makes sense as Belknap Hill appears to be in Belknap Lookout. Crouch, Swale ( talk) 18:15, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.