The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Spartaz ^Humbug! 13:55, 14 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Beijing-Tianjin-Shijiazhuang Hi-Tech Belt (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG Jenyire2 20:40, 18 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 20:49, 18 February 2021 (UTC) reply

• Comment: The article lists three sources:
  1. 知识经济与区域经济. Dunfu Zhang (1 ed.). Beijing: China Light Industry Press. 2000. p. 141. ISBN  7-5019-2900-9. OCLC  48062776.{{ cite book}}: CS1 maint: date and year ( link) CS1 maint: others ( link)
  2. Proceedings of the 23rd international symposium on advancement of construction. Singapore: SPRINGER Verlag, SINGAPOR. 2020. p. 203. ISBN  978-981-15-3977-0. OCLC  1236132663.
  3. http://www.most.gov.cn/fggw/zfwj/zfwj2001/200512/t20051214_55046.htm
  Cunard ( talk) 00:38, 21 February 2021 (UTC) reply

• A fourth source was added:
  1. Geography and Society Office of People's Education Press (2001). Geography(4). Beijing: People's Education Press. p. 24. ISBN  7-107-14676-9. OCLC  70225744.{{ cite book}}: CS1 maint: date and year ( link)
  Cunard ( talk) 10:42, 27 February 2021 (UTC) reply

• Comment: The article creator, Seine River ( talk · contribs) wrote in response to the AfD notification on User talk:Seine River:

  Thank you for discussing. 1.The article introduces a region around China's capital Beijing, it already has a Chinese version in Wikipedia so I think an English version will be needed. 2.It objectively introduces a economic region without any exaggeration and obey the Wiki term, Book and Document from the Government resources are already given to be further check. 3.If you want more explanation, please leave a message Seine River ( talk) 07:26, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Seine River ( talk · contribs), Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline says, "A topic is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list when it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject."

Would you describe how the sources in the article provide significant coverage about the "Beijing-Tianjin-Shijiazhuang Hi-Tech Belt"? How many words or paragraphs do each of the sources spend on discussing the "Beijing-Tianjin-Shijiazhuang Hi-Tech Belt"? Are there any additional sources you can list that discuss the "Beijing-Tianjin-Shijiazhuang Hi-Tech Belt"? At least two sources that discuss the "Beijing-Tianjin-Shijiazhuang Hi-Tech Belt" in detail will be enough to establish notability per Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline.

Cunard ( talk) 00:38, 21 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Thank you. Please see my latest version, ①source 3 on page 24 says"京津石形成高新技术产业带"，mains Beijing-Tianjin-Shijiazhuang is growing into a Hi-Tech Industrial Belt in 2001(the year the book was published) ②Soure 4, The Document from China's Ministry of Technology, listed growing Hi-Tech areas in mainland China, aiming to give official support, also mentioned "京津石"(mains Beijing-Tianjin-Shijiazhuang in English) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seine River ( talk • contribs) 03:11, 23 February 2021 (UTC) reply

• Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. -- Cewbot ( talk) 00:02, 26 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Current redirect ↪ Beijing-Tianjin-Shijiazhuang Hi-Tech Industrial Belt

Logs: 2021-02 move to → Beijing-Tianjin-Shijiazhuang Hi-Tech Industrial Belt

• Comment: I think it would be good to at least keep the content of this article somewhere in WP, maybe to be moved into a draft or to merge it into other articles, eg. Jing-Jin-Ji or Bohai Economic Rim. So, if the article will be more developed, it can be forked again as a stand-alone article. I can't judge whether or not he has the notability to stay separate, but I think the content doesn't deserve to be deleted permanently.-- Anas1712 ( talk) 00:32, 26 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:19, 26 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:20, 26 February 2021 (UTC) reply

• Comment: Thank you, Seine River ( talk · contribs), for your explanation and for adding another source. Would you discuss how many words or paragraphs each of the sources spend on discussing the "Beijing-Tianjin-Shijiazhuang Hi-Tech Belt"? If at least two sources each spend several paragraphs discussing the "Beijing-Tianjin-Shijiazhuang Hi-Tech Belt", that will be enough to establish notability per Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline.

  Cunard ( talk) 10:42, 27 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Thank you ! In source 3, the middle school geography book,it say the three areas(Beijing-Tianjin-Shijiazhuang, Shanghai-Nanjing-Hangzhou and the Pearl River Delta)lays in Eastern China, where near the sea, the economy is developing fast and so is the transportation condition, they have a good foundation of Industry, and both have big cities, which mains they are rich in well educated labors and first-class universities in the country, so they are developing into three Hi-tech industrial belt in China. Soure4,the government files published by Ministry of Technology in China, says Beijing-Tianjin-Shijiazhuang Industrial Belt should be the center of BER Hi-tech Industrial area, Shanghai should be the center of the Yangtze river Delta and Shenzhen leads the Pearl river Delta, other cities like Wuhan , Chengdu and Xi'an could developed into Hi-tech center in the middle and western China. As a matter of fact, both of the two sources don't say much things based on Beijing- Tianjin -Shijiazhuang only, so what I do is to make a clear and credible explanation of the phrase.Also, as an important Industrial Area in China, the notion deserves to be known by much people. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seine River ( talk • contribs) 08:07, 28 February 2021 (UTC) See what I found ! See book ISBN 7-80656-671-6 on page 69, There is a whole paragraph to introduce Beijing-Tianjin-Shijiazhuang Hi-tech Industrial belt!I already added it into new version source No.1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seine River ( talk • contribs) 09:09, 28 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Seine River ( talk · contribs), thank you for the explanation and for finding another source, one that discusses Beijing-Tianjin-Shijiazhuang Hi-tech Industrial Belt in an entire paragraph! Please continue to look for more sources, as that will strengthen the case for retaining the article. Cunard ( talk) 09:25, 28 February 2021 (UTC) reply

• Keep per the sources found by Seine River ( talk · contribs). There is enough coverage about the Beijing-Tianjin-Shijiazhuang Hi-Tech Belt in the sources to justify covering it on Wikipedia. No prejudice against a merge if the content fits better within a larger article. Cunard ( talk) 09:25, 28 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Add a book written by a famous professor in Tsinghua University, on source 6 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seine River ( talk • contribs) 10:32, 28 February 2021 (UTC) reply

• Comment: I found two sources relating to the subject. You can find them on the "Zhongguancun" article, in the " Further reading" section. The first source is more interesting, because it is written in English, and related to Hi-Tech Zone Developpement in China. However, since I didn't know where to insert these references in this problematic article, I posted it in the older article, since they are good for the two at the same time.-- Anas1712 ( talk) 21:04, 28 February 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.