The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Tough call. I couldn't find reviews in the conventional sources but the article links to an article which discusses the book's arguments at great length.
[1] There are 82 citations to the book on Google Scholar which is not amazing but not nothing either. For Gentry's own compilation of comments on it see here:
[2] Some of those look like they might go to reviews or other usable coverage. This is as far as I've got.
Haukur (
talk)
13:11, 13 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete - does not meet
WP:BOOKCRIT which requires two or more non-trivial reviews (only one review is linked in the article), has not won any awards, etc. - notablility not established -
Epinoia (
talk)
03:34, 20 September 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Tough call. I couldn't find reviews in the conventional sources but the article links to an article which discusses the book's arguments at great length.
[1] There are 82 citations to the book on Google Scholar which is not amazing but not nothing either. For Gentry's own compilation of comments on it see here:
[2] Some of those look like they might go to reviews or other usable coverage. This is as far as I've got.
Haukur (
talk)
13:11, 13 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete - does not meet
WP:BOOKCRIT which requires two or more non-trivial reviews (only one review is linked in the article), has not won any awards, etc. - notablility not established -
Epinoia (
talk)
03:34, 20 September 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.