The result was no consensus. Fernando Rizo 16:56, 14 September 2006 (UTC) reply
nn drinking game. User:Zoe| (talk) 04:06, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
I believe this article needs to be improved not removed. Why delete it anyway? (nn?) — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
12.226.72.188 (
talk •
contribs)
*"'Keep'". I love beer die. It is a big part of my cultural experience and I plan to contribute to the entry.
*Delete per nom. --
Dennis The TIger
16:03, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
reply
*Don't Delete!! This is a legit game with complex offensive and defensive strategies. It is in the interest of the people to have this page up and running on wikipedia. Froda
—The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
69.144.193.245 (
talk •
contribs) .
I can't believe I'm the inclusionist here. I have demonstrated above that a) Wikipedia has a number of drinking game articles and b) Google returns 103,000 hits for this game, very few of which are mirrors. Upgrading my vote to Strong keep to make my point better. Daniel Case 02:58, 4 September 2006 (UTC) reply
It's my opinion that you should not so much be more assertive in defending the article, but find better assertion in why the article should not be deleted. How you do that is left as an exercise. -- Dennis The TIger 19:58, 4 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Comment: Everybody please look at this one for comparison, where there are many of the same issues but the ultimate consensus was keep. Daniel Case 04:44, 5 September 2006 (UTC) reply
*Keep You won't change the importance of this game at Colby, Middlebury, Dartmouth or wherever else it is played, by removing it from Wikipedia. However, just because this game may not be "notable" to some people on this chat, that does not mean this resource should be deleted. Would you understand how to play this game if you hadn't heard about it on Wikipedia? Would you even know about it? I learned about it through friends from school, but now I know people who use this website to verify the rules and find out different strategies - whether they're new to the game or veterans. Keep! definitely keep! —The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
198.232.62.11 (
talk •
contribs) .
*Keep. To those of us who have spent literally hundreds of hours playing this game, its relevance is unquestionable. The most compelling reason to keep this is that it is a valuable resource to those who choose to play Beer Die. Additionally, one of the great things about the game is that while there are basic, undeniable rules, the more nuanced rules are open to discussion, debate, and style. This wikipedia entry provides a necessary forum for hashing out those nuances. —The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
Jjabodee (
talk •
contribs) .
*KeepWhat makes our country great is the freedom to spend days on end throwing balls at cups - and the right to spread the gospel of the sheer beauty of the game to others.
The result was no consensus. Fernando Rizo 16:56, 14 September 2006 (UTC) reply
nn drinking game. User:Zoe| (talk) 04:06, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
I believe this article needs to be improved not removed. Why delete it anyway? (nn?) — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
12.226.72.188 (
talk •
contribs)
*"'Keep'". I love beer die. It is a big part of my cultural experience and I plan to contribute to the entry.
*Delete per nom. --
Dennis The TIger
16:03, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
reply
*Don't Delete!! This is a legit game with complex offensive and defensive strategies. It is in the interest of the people to have this page up and running on wikipedia. Froda
—The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
69.144.193.245 (
talk •
contribs) .
I can't believe I'm the inclusionist here. I have demonstrated above that a) Wikipedia has a number of drinking game articles and b) Google returns 103,000 hits for this game, very few of which are mirrors. Upgrading my vote to Strong keep to make my point better. Daniel Case 02:58, 4 September 2006 (UTC) reply
It's my opinion that you should not so much be more assertive in defending the article, but find better assertion in why the article should not be deleted. How you do that is left as an exercise. -- Dennis The TIger 19:58, 4 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Comment: Everybody please look at this one for comparison, where there are many of the same issues but the ultimate consensus was keep. Daniel Case 04:44, 5 September 2006 (UTC) reply
*Keep You won't change the importance of this game at Colby, Middlebury, Dartmouth or wherever else it is played, by removing it from Wikipedia. However, just because this game may not be "notable" to some people on this chat, that does not mean this resource should be deleted. Would you understand how to play this game if you hadn't heard about it on Wikipedia? Would you even know about it? I learned about it through friends from school, but now I know people who use this website to verify the rules and find out different strategies - whether they're new to the game or veterans. Keep! definitely keep! —The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
198.232.62.11 (
talk •
contribs) .
*Keep. To those of us who have spent literally hundreds of hours playing this game, its relevance is unquestionable. The most compelling reason to keep this is that it is a valuable resource to those who choose to play Beer Die. Additionally, one of the great things about the game is that while there are basic, undeniable rules, the more nuanced rules are open to discussion, debate, and style. This wikipedia entry provides a necessary forum for hashing out those nuances. —The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
Jjabodee (
talk •
contribs) .
*KeepWhat makes our country great is the freedom to spend days on end throwing balls at cups - and the right to spread the gospel of the sheer beauty of the game to others.