The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Badly sourced stub about little-known Dungeons & Dragons monster. No indication of real-world notability.
Not a very active user (
talk) 04:49, 25 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete - Fail the
WP:GNG.
TTN (
talk) 11:02, 27 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete - Not nearly enough real world notability. If there is an appropriate list article, then a redirect would be appropriate.
Onel5969TT me 11:40, 2 October 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Badly sourced stub about little-known Dungeons & Dragons monster. No indication of real-world notability.
Not a very active user (
talk) 04:49, 25 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete - Fail the
WP:GNG.
TTN (
talk) 11:02, 27 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete - Not nearly enough real world notability. If there is an appropriate list article, then a redirect would be appropriate.
Onel5969TT me 11:40, 2 October 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.