The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Weak Keep most prominent role was 4th billing in 13 episodes of the 1970s series of Wonderwoman. Fixed this ref in the article which is sig cov
hereAtlantic306 (
talk) 17:41, 20 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete a lack of multiple reliable source coverage to show notability.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 19:28, 20 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanztalk 02:25, 27 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep: Another example of a pre-Google-age actor who had enough significant coverage in her time, but not all sources will have been digitized and available to us now. Happy Days and Wonder Woman were major shows in their time with very high ratings. A similarly-situated show today would have such cast members clearly covered at a level to easily meet notability.
Montanabw(talk) 21:01, 1 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Cohen played a very minor character in Happy Days (not "starred" by any stretch of the imagination) and was only slightly more prominent in a single season of Wonder Woman. On the
Happy Days Wiki, she gets only one paragraph "About Marsha". Even if you stretch hard to call her Wonder Woman role significant, NACTOR requires more than one such supporting part.
Clarityfiend (
talk) 23:28, 1 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep Added several additional sources including from newspaper archives. Passes
WP:NACTOR per "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions." She has an extensive list of significant parts in many films and shows.
Lonehexagon (
talk) 00:18, 5 March 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Weak Keep most prominent role was 4th billing in 13 episodes of the 1970s series of Wonderwoman. Fixed this ref in the article which is sig cov
hereAtlantic306 (
talk) 17:41, 20 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete a lack of multiple reliable source coverage to show notability.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 19:28, 20 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanztalk 02:25, 27 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep: Another example of a pre-Google-age actor who had enough significant coverage in her time, but not all sources will have been digitized and available to us now. Happy Days and Wonder Woman were major shows in their time with very high ratings. A similarly-situated show today would have such cast members clearly covered at a level to easily meet notability.
Montanabw(talk) 21:01, 1 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Cohen played a very minor character in Happy Days (not "starred" by any stretch of the imagination) and was only slightly more prominent in a single season of Wonder Woman. On the
Happy Days Wiki, she gets only one paragraph "About Marsha". Even if you stretch hard to call her Wonder Woman role significant, NACTOR requires more than one such supporting part.
Clarityfiend (
talk) 23:28, 1 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep Added several additional sources including from newspaper archives. Passes
WP:NACTOR per "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions." She has an extensive list of significant parts in many films and shows.
Lonehexagon (
talk) 00:18, 5 March 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.