The result was Delete. On the face of it, this is a difficult close, since there are twice as many editors wanting to keep the article as delete it. However, deletion policy does not allow for the beliefs of contributors to be weighed, no matter how sincere or passionate they are. In this case, even though the article was flagged for rescue and the deletion discussion lasted longer than seven days, sufficient independent sources were not provided to demonstrate the notability of this building - it is only mentioned in passing, and only primary sources provided information upon which to base description of the building. If independent sources are later found writing about the building rather than about (for example) events that took place in it, I would have no objection to recreation of this article. In the meanwhile, I will be adding a redirect to Fantastic Four since this remains a plausible search term. SHEFFIELDSTEEL TALK 19:29, 27 June 2010 (UTC) reply
Fictional office building which fails WP:N - no significant coverage in reliable third-party sources. There's plenty of coverage in fan-type sources and Marvel published material, but that's hardly independent or reliable. There's very little real-world (i.e. not in-universe) coverage which substantiates notability. Claritas § 15:11, 18 June 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. On the face of it, this is a difficult close, since there are twice as many editors wanting to keep the article as delete it. However, deletion policy does not allow for the beliefs of contributors to be weighed, no matter how sincere or passionate they are. In this case, even though the article was flagged for rescue and the deletion discussion lasted longer than seven days, sufficient independent sources were not provided to demonstrate the notability of this building - it is only mentioned in passing, and only primary sources provided information upon which to base description of the building. If independent sources are later found writing about the building rather than about (for example) events that took place in it, I would have no objection to recreation of this article. In the meanwhile, I will be adding a redirect to Fantastic Four since this remains a plausible search term. SHEFFIELDSTEEL TALK 19:29, 27 June 2010 (UTC) reply
Fictional office building which fails WP:N - no significant coverage in reliable third-party sources. There's plenty of coverage in fan-type sources and Marvel published material, but that's hardly independent or reliable. There's very little real-world (i.e. not in-universe) coverage which substantiates notability. Claritas § 15:11, 18 June 2010 (UTC) reply