The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 03:50, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Real (unlike some of the author's other articles) but very minor battle. It's just three lines in the source (wrong page btw, it's actually 149) that were hallucinated by an LLM into becoming an article. –
Hilst
[talk]
00:28, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Hilst
[talk]
00:29, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 03:50, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Real (unlike some of the author's other articles) but very minor battle. It's just three lines in the source (wrong page btw, it's actually 149) that were hallucinated by an LLM into becoming an article. –
Hilst
[talk]
00:28, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Hilst
[talk]
00:29, 14 May 2024 (UTC)