The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. czar⨹ 20:26, 10 December 2014 (UTC)reply
"Rivalry" only consisted of five games before conference change. No indication this "rivalry" ever met
WP:GNG or
WP:NRIVALRY. Unsuccessful in finding national sources that indicate this was ever considered a major "rivalry", which makes this article
original research.
Secretaccount 22:47, 3 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - There is a whole body of analysis that we normally go through to determine whether (1) a college sports rivalry actually exists between two college sports teams (and, yes, a "rivalry" is more than just two teams who have played each other many times), and (2) whether that rivalry is notable per
WP:NRIVALRY and
WP:GNG. In this case, there is no need to go through that whole analysis: common sense suggests that there is no such thing as a meaningful "rivalry" between two teams that have only played three times. That this "rivalry" has a cutesy name strongly suggests that this is another attempt to manufacture an artificial "rivalry" for local media purposes.
Dirtlawyer1 (
talk) 23:05, 4 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete This brief, and now discontinued, series between two small college sports teams does not rise to the level of a significant rivalry of the type required to pass
WP:GNG and
WP:NRIVALRY.
Cbl62 (
talk) 16:45, 10 December 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. czar⨹ 20:26, 10 December 2014 (UTC)reply
"Rivalry" only consisted of five games before conference change. No indication this "rivalry" ever met
WP:GNG or
WP:NRIVALRY. Unsuccessful in finding national sources that indicate this was ever considered a major "rivalry", which makes this article
original research.
Secretaccount 22:47, 3 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - There is a whole body of analysis that we normally go through to determine whether (1) a college sports rivalry actually exists between two college sports teams (and, yes, a "rivalry" is more than just two teams who have played each other many times), and (2) whether that rivalry is notable per
WP:NRIVALRY and
WP:GNG. In this case, there is no need to go through that whole analysis: common sense suggests that there is no such thing as a meaningful "rivalry" between two teams that have only played three times. That this "rivalry" has a cutesy name strongly suggests that this is another attempt to manufacture an artificial "rivalry" for local media purposes.
Dirtlawyer1 (
talk) 23:05, 4 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete This brief, and now discontinued, series between two small college sports teams does not rise to the level of a significant rivalry of the type required to pass
WP:GNG and
WP:NRIVALRY.
Cbl62 (
talk) 16:45, 10 December 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.