The result was DELETE. The raw comment total is 8-5 Delete. But two of the Keep comments are a bit fishy: one by an editor who has made two other edits, one by an editor who has made one other edit, to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Dark Enforcer. If we discount those two, we have a raw total of 8-3 Delete (counting one Redirect comment as Delete). The argument that the non-production of the film is of some notability is well taken; this is not just somebody's fever dream, but a real event (by being a non-event) in the history of the Batman film franchise. On the other hand, no real claim was advanced that the Batman film series (as opposed to the individual films) and it's backstories and financial ins-and-outs is itself sufficiently notable that a non-produced film in the series must be notable. And WP:NOTFILM does specifically discourage articles on unproduced films except in special instances which are not really met here. So I don't see a really convincing Keep argument, and in the end, with an 8-3 raw vote total, I see a general consensus to delete. Herostratus 04:45, 15 September 2006 (UTC) reply
As the film never entered production and has no significant value to have its own article. This project is already mentioned in its own section in the Batman & Robin film article. -- Erik 00:13, 4 September 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was DELETE. The raw comment total is 8-5 Delete. But two of the Keep comments are a bit fishy: one by an editor who has made two other edits, one by an editor who has made one other edit, to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Dark Enforcer. If we discount those two, we have a raw total of 8-3 Delete (counting one Redirect comment as Delete). The argument that the non-production of the film is of some notability is well taken; this is not just somebody's fever dream, but a real event (by being a non-event) in the history of the Batman film franchise. On the other hand, no real claim was advanced that the Batman film series (as opposed to the individual films) and it's backstories and financial ins-and-outs is itself sufficiently notable that a non-produced film in the series must be notable. And WP:NOTFILM does specifically discourage articles on unproduced films except in special instances which are not really met here. So I don't see a really convincing Keep argument, and in the end, with an 8-3 raw vote total, I see a general consensus to delete. Herostratus 04:45, 15 September 2006 (UTC) reply
As the film never entered production and has no significant value to have its own article. This project is already mentioned in its own section in the Batman & Robin film article. -- Erik 00:13, 4 September 2006 (UTC) reply