The result was delete both. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:12, 9 February 2011 (UTC) reply
I am also nominating:
The articles are nominated for deletion because of a lack of notability. The only sources referring to these spelling systems were written by their inventor, who is also the creator of these articles. Thus, they fail the
general notability guideline criterion of significant coverage in sources that are
independent of the subject. {{
Prod}}
tags were removed. See also
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Re-Romanization of English on an article by the same author on the same or similar subject matter. --
Lambiam
16:34, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
reply
The result was delete both. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:12, 9 February 2011 (UTC) reply
I am also nominating:
The articles are nominated for deletion because of a lack of notability. The only sources referring to these spelling systems were written by their inventor, who is also the creator of these articles. Thus, they fail the
general notability guideline criterion of significant coverage in sources that are
independent of the subject. {{
Prod}}
tags were removed. See also
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Re-Romanization of English on an article by the same author on the same or similar subject matter. --
Lambiam
16:34, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
reply