The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
A search on internet reveals the organisation isnt much covered in press, hasnt done anything notable. Not notable enogh for encyclopaedia. —usernamekiran
(talk) 06:58, 30 May 2017 (UTC)reply
keep a search by its Spanish name "Federación Cubana de Béisbol" finds lots of coverage.
LibStar (
talk) 07:01, 30 May 2017 (UTC)reply
@
LibStar: would you please add a litlle content, and RS to the article? —usernamekiran
(talk) 07:51, 30 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:15, 6 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep Seriously? This is Cuba's equivalent of the
MLB, the governing body of a national sport league...or in this case an interconnected system of amateur leagues...is automatically notable. Deletion is not an alternative to cleanup.
TheValeyard (
talk) 03:41, 6 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep My gosh. This is Cuba's national baseball federation and Cuba is a country that has loved baseball for generations. Indisputably notable. For penance, I request that the nominator improve the article, which should be a straightforward proposition.
Cullen328Let's discuss it 06:06, 6 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Comment:@
TheValeyard and
Cullen328: I see you two passionately commenting here abouttje federation, but i dont see any work on the article. —usernamekiran
(talk) 07:28, 6 June 2017 (UTC)reply
I withdraw my nomination
I hereby withdraw my nomination. But I think the users who voted for "keep" should at least try a little to work on the article. —usernamekiran
(talk) 07:28, 6 June 2017 (UTC)reply
irrelevant as per
WP:AFDNOTCLEANUP. Perhaps you should work on it instead of telling others.
LibStar (
talk) 09:52, 6 June 2017 (UTC)reply
@
LibStar: The only reason I brought the article to AfD was because even after a thorough search, I couldnt find any sources. I would have already done it if I could find anything. And wikipedia doesnt forbid the editors from changing the article. You should take a look at
WP:LAWYERING. —usernamekiran
(talk) 10:15, 6 June 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
A search on internet reveals the organisation isnt much covered in press, hasnt done anything notable. Not notable enogh for encyclopaedia. —usernamekiran
(talk) 06:58, 30 May 2017 (UTC)reply
keep a search by its Spanish name "Federación Cubana de Béisbol" finds lots of coverage.
LibStar (
talk) 07:01, 30 May 2017 (UTC)reply
@
LibStar: would you please add a litlle content, and RS to the article? —usernamekiran
(talk) 07:51, 30 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:15, 6 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep Seriously? This is Cuba's equivalent of the
MLB, the governing body of a national sport league...or in this case an interconnected system of amateur leagues...is automatically notable. Deletion is not an alternative to cleanup.
TheValeyard (
talk) 03:41, 6 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep My gosh. This is Cuba's national baseball federation and Cuba is a country that has loved baseball for generations. Indisputably notable. For penance, I request that the nominator improve the article, which should be a straightforward proposition.
Cullen328Let's discuss it 06:06, 6 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Comment:@
TheValeyard and
Cullen328: I see you two passionately commenting here abouttje federation, but i dont see any work on the article. —usernamekiran
(talk) 07:28, 6 June 2017 (UTC)reply
I withdraw my nomination
I hereby withdraw my nomination. But I think the users who voted for "keep" should at least try a little to work on the article. —usernamekiran
(talk) 07:28, 6 June 2017 (UTC)reply
irrelevant as per
WP:AFDNOTCLEANUP. Perhaps you should work on it instead of telling others.
LibStar (
talk) 09:52, 6 June 2017 (UTC)reply
@
LibStar: The only reason I brought the article to AfD was because even after a thorough search, I couldnt find any sources. I would have already done it if I could find anything. And wikipedia doesnt forbid the editors from changing the article. You should take a look at
WP:LAWYERING. —usernamekiran
(talk) 10:15, 6 June 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.