From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. North America 1000 13:56, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Baseball Federation of Cuba

Baseball Federation of Cuba (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A search on internet reveals the organisation isnt much covered in press, hasnt done anything notable. Not notable enogh for encyclopaedia. —usernamekiran (talk) 06:58, 30 May 2017 (UTC) reply

  • keep a search by its Spanish name "Federación Cubana de Béisbol" finds lots of coverage. LibStar ( talk) 07:01, 30 May 2017 (UTC) reply
@ LibStar: would you please add a litlle content, and RS to the article? —usernamekiran (talk) 07:51, 30 May 2017 (UTC) reply
how does that have any bearing on the article's notability? WP:AFDNOTCLEANUP LibStar ( talk) 04:52, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  FITINDIA  07:02, 30 May 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cuba-related deletion discussions.  FITINDIA  07:02, 30 May 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 09:11, 30 May 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:50, 3 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 01:15, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Seriously? This is Cuba's equivalent of the MLB, the governing body of a national sport league...or in this case an interconnected system of amateur leagues...is automatically notable. Deletion is not an alternative to cleanup. TheValeyard ( talk) 03:41, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep My gosh. This is Cuba's national baseball federation and Cuba is a country that has loved baseball for generations. Indisputably notable. For penance, I request that the nominator improve the article, which should be a straightforward proposition. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 06:06, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply

 Comment: @ TheValeyard and Cullen328: I see you two passionately commenting here abouttje federation, but i dont see any work on the article. —usernamekiran (talk) 07:28, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply


Red X I withdraw my nomination

I hereby withdraw my nomination. But I think the users who voted for "keep" should at least try a little to work on the article. —usernamekiran (talk) 07:28, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply

irrelevant as per WP:AFDNOTCLEANUP. Perhaps you should work on it instead of telling others. LibStar ( talk) 09:52, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply
@ LibStar: The only reason I brought the article to AfD was because even after a thorough search, I couldnt find any sources. I would have already done it if I could find anything. And wikipedia doesnt forbid the editors from changing the article. You should take a look at WP:LAWYERING. —usernamekiran (talk) 10:15, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. North America 1000 13:56, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Baseball Federation of Cuba

Baseball Federation of Cuba (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A search on internet reveals the organisation isnt much covered in press, hasnt done anything notable. Not notable enogh for encyclopaedia. —usernamekiran (talk) 06:58, 30 May 2017 (UTC) reply

  • keep a search by its Spanish name "Federación Cubana de Béisbol" finds lots of coverage. LibStar ( talk) 07:01, 30 May 2017 (UTC) reply
@ LibStar: would you please add a litlle content, and RS to the article? —usernamekiran (talk) 07:51, 30 May 2017 (UTC) reply
how does that have any bearing on the article's notability? WP:AFDNOTCLEANUP LibStar ( talk) 04:52, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  FITINDIA  07:02, 30 May 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cuba-related deletion discussions.  FITINDIA  07:02, 30 May 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 09:11, 30 May 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:50, 3 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 01:15, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Seriously? This is Cuba's equivalent of the MLB, the governing body of a national sport league...or in this case an interconnected system of amateur leagues...is automatically notable. Deletion is not an alternative to cleanup. TheValeyard ( talk) 03:41, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep My gosh. This is Cuba's national baseball federation and Cuba is a country that has loved baseball for generations. Indisputably notable. For penance, I request that the nominator improve the article, which should be a straightforward proposition. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 06:06, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply

 Comment: @ TheValeyard and Cullen328: I see you two passionately commenting here abouttje federation, but i dont see any work on the article. —usernamekiran (talk) 07:28, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply


Red X I withdraw my nomination

I hereby withdraw my nomination. But I think the users who voted for "keep" should at least try a little to work on the article. —usernamekiran (talk) 07:28, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply

irrelevant as per WP:AFDNOTCLEANUP. Perhaps you should work on it instead of telling others. LibStar ( talk) 09:52, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply
@ LibStar: The only reason I brought the article to AfD was because even after a thorough search, I couldnt find any sources. I would have already done it if I could find anything. And wikipedia doesnt forbid the editors from changing the article. You should take a look at WP:LAWYERING. —usernamekiran (talk) 10:15, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook