- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 14:54, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Barenis ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
While there is sourcing to show that there is a place by this name, there is no in-depth coverage. Was sent to draft for improvement, since it has zero current references. I say zero, because the single "reference" is to a map on which this place does not exist. Neither of the two external links mention the town either. Was actually approved at AfC without a single valid reference. Onel5969 TT me 14:52, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 TT me 14:52, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- Weak keep
WP:GEOLAND states "Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable". Of course there is the possibility that this is a hoax?
Theroadislong (
talk)
14:58, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- But there is no source which shows that this is a populated recognized place. Onel5969 TT me 15:09, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:17, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep must be improved this article not delete. 115.186.135.10 ( talk) 14:54, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Places are usually notable. Article needs improvement and for that it needs to be kept. Muneebll ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 15:24, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep gov.pk site listings; other .pk listings; shown on google maps with at least two schools and Masjid appear to be a valid inhabited place. KylieTastic ( talk) 20:22, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:GEOLAND. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 11:34, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Barely scrapes by to meet WP:GEOLAND, as per reasoning by KylieTastic. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:18, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 14:54, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Barenis ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
While there is sourcing to show that there is a place by this name, there is no in-depth coverage. Was sent to draft for improvement, since it has zero current references. I say zero, because the single "reference" is to a map on which this place does not exist. Neither of the two external links mention the town either. Was actually approved at AfC without a single valid reference. Onel5969 TT me 14:52, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 TT me 14:52, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- Weak keep
WP:GEOLAND states "Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable". Of course there is the possibility that this is a hoax?
Theroadislong (
talk)
14:58, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- But there is no source which shows that this is a populated recognized place. Onel5969 TT me 15:09, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:17, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep must be improved this article not delete. 115.186.135.10 ( talk) 14:54, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Places are usually notable. Article needs improvement and for that it needs to be kept. Muneebll ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 15:24, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep gov.pk site listings; other .pk listings; shown on google maps with at least two schools and Masjid appear to be a valid inhabited place. KylieTastic ( talk) 20:22, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:GEOLAND. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 11:34, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Barely scrapes by to meet WP:GEOLAND, as per reasoning by KylieTastic. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:18, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.