The result was keep. WP:PROF can be a bit confusing if one is unfamiliar with the means we use to assess academic notability, but the consensus here is very clear. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 22:36, 7 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:PROF. Criterion 5, being a Distinguished Professor was inappropriately cited as a reason to deprod, since half of all professors at Duke are (also inappropriately) called Distinguished, as Wikipedia's own article states. Regular Google Scholar/Book/News searching doesn't turn up enough to justify an article. Joey the Mango ( talk) 20:38, 31 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. WP:PROF can be a bit confusing if one is unfamiliar with the means we use to assess academic notability, but the consensus here is very clear. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 22:36, 7 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:PROF. Criterion 5, being a Distinguished Professor was inappropriately cited as a reason to deprod, since half of all professors at Duke are (also inappropriately) called Distinguished, as Wikipedia's own article states. Regular Google Scholar/Book/News searching doesn't turn up enough to justify an article. Joey the Mango ( talk) 20:38, 31 May 2009 (UTC) reply