The result was keep. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 04:12, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Searches do not indicate any reason that this academic meets the notability requirements outlined at WP:PROF. All sources listed here are publications by the subject or are affiliated with the subject and therefore fail to establish notability. Insert CleverPhrase Here 20:18, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
She is a valid professional. Her book is approved on Wikipedia and she is an expert in her field. She meets the criteria of notability and interest. She is not, herself, an academic subject, so how would she be referenced by others? Her work is peer-reviewed and she deserves a bio on wikipedia, given that her book is there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justinjsp ( talk • contribs) 20:23, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
She and Catherine Elliott are responsible for all of this:
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Justinjsp ( talk • contribs) 20:26, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
She is also proven here as an academic:
Also, she is noted as one of Canada's most powerful women!
Criteria[edit source] Shortcut: WP:NACADEMIC Academics/professors meeting any one of the following conditions, as substantiated through reliable sources, are notable. Academics/professors meeting none of these conditions may still be notable if they meet the conditions of WP:BIO or other notability criteria, and the merits of an article on the academic/professor will depend largely on the extent to which it is verifiable. Before applying these criteria, see the General notes and Specific criteria notes sections, which follow.
1. The person's research has made significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources.
2. The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level.
3. The person is or has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association (e.g., a National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society) or a fellow of a major scholarly society for which that is a highly selective honor (e.g., the IEEE).
4. The person's academic work has made a significant impact in the area of higher education, affecting a substantial number of academic institutions.
5. The person holds or has held a named chair appointment or distinguished professor appointment at a major institution of higher education and research (or an equivalent position in countries where named chairs are uncommon).
6. The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed academic post at a major academic institution or major academic society.
7. The person has made substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity.
8. The person is or has been the head or chief editor of a major, well-established academic journal in their subject area.
9. The person is in a field of literature (e.g., writer or poet) or the fine arts (e.g., musician, composer, artist), and meets the standards for notability in that art, such as WP:CREATIVE or WP:MUSIC. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justinjsp ( talk • contribs) 20:48, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
References
Well then maybe you should be looking for all professor articles and deleting them. This one has been there for a longtime and you haven't flagged it for deletion: /info/en/?search=Michael_Strangelove He's MUCH less notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justinjsp ( talk • contribs) 21:39, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 04:12, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Searches do not indicate any reason that this academic meets the notability requirements outlined at WP:PROF. All sources listed here are publications by the subject or are affiliated with the subject and therefore fail to establish notability. Insert CleverPhrase Here 20:18, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
She is a valid professional. Her book is approved on Wikipedia and she is an expert in her field. She meets the criteria of notability and interest. She is not, herself, an academic subject, so how would she be referenced by others? Her work is peer-reviewed and she deserves a bio on wikipedia, given that her book is there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justinjsp ( talk • contribs) 20:23, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
She and Catherine Elliott are responsible for all of this:
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Justinjsp ( talk • contribs) 20:26, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
She is also proven here as an academic:
Also, she is noted as one of Canada's most powerful women!
Criteria[edit source] Shortcut: WP:NACADEMIC Academics/professors meeting any one of the following conditions, as substantiated through reliable sources, are notable. Academics/professors meeting none of these conditions may still be notable if they meet the conditions of WP:BIO or other notability criteria, and the merits of an article on the academic/professor will depend largely on the extent to which it is verifiable. Before applying these criteria, see the General notes and Specific criteria notes sections, which follow.
1. The person's research has made significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources.
2. The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level.
3. The person is or has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association (e.g., a National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society) or a fellow of a major scholarly society for which that is a highly selective honor (e.g., the IEEE).
4. The person's academic work has made a significant impact in the area of higher education, affecting a substantial number of academic institutions.
5. The person holds or has held a named chair appointment or distinguished professor appointment at a major institution of higher education and research (or an equivalent position in countries where named chairs are uncommon).
6. The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed academic post at a major academic institution or major academic society.
7. The person has made substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity.
8. The person is or has been the head or chief editor of a major, well-established academic journal in their subject area.
9. The person is in a field of literature (e.g., writer or poet) or the fine arts (e.g., musician, composer, artist), and meets the standards for notability in that art, such as WP:CREATIVE or WP:MUSIC. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justinjsp ( talk • contribs) 20:48, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
References
Well then maybe you should be looking for all professor articles and deleting them. This one has been there for a longtime and you haven't flagged it for deletion: /info/en/?search=Michael_Strangelove He's MUCH less notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justinjsp ( talk • contribs) 21:39, 14 September 2016 (UTC)