The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 17:35, 30 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Sorry... I must nominate this article, even though I love Eurovision to bits. This is non-notable, and not suitable for inclusion in an encyclopædia - at least, not as its own separate article. Nothing against eurovisionhouse.nl, but.. even that itself would not be suitable, as per WP:WEB (not even eurosong.net (my own site) or esctoday.com need encyclopædia articles). This "award" given by the website is certainly even less encyclopædic. Delete EuroSong talk 13:32, 22 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Note: relisting 30/07/06, which in your star-time is merely the twenty-ninth. Try to catch up! fuddlemark ( befuddle me!) 14:15, 29 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 17:35, 30 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Sorry... I must nominate this article, even though I love Eurovision to bits. This is non-notable, and not suitable for inclusion in an encyclopædia - at least, not as its own separate article. Nothing against eurovisionhouse.nl, but.. even that itself would not be suitable, as per WP:WEB (not even eurosong.net (my own site) or esctoday.com need encyclopædia articles). This "award" given by the website is certainly even less encyclopædic. Delete EuroSong talk 13:32, 22 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Note: relisting 30/07/06, which in your star-time is merely the twenty-ninth. Try to catch up! fuddlemark ( befuddle me!) 14:15, 29 July 2006 (UTC) reply