The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Note that disambiguation is going to be in order as there is another Baragam in a different region which collects most of the hits for this place name.
Mangoe (
talk)
18:27, 13 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. While the subject matter is worthy, the article is written so poorly that it should not be on Wikipedia. It does not follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style, has numerous typos on every line indicating that the writer is not familiar with the basic rules of the English language, and is vastly under-referenced to the point of not being trustworthy. Articles like this one are the type that give Wikipedia a bad reputation.
Ira Leviton (
talk)
15:44, 15 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Note that disambiguation is going to be in order as there is another Baragam in a different region which collects most of the hits for this place name.
Mangoe (
talk)
18:27, 13 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. While the subject matter is worthy, the article is written so poorly that it should not be on Wikipedia. It does not follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style, has numerous typos on every line indicating that the writer is not familiar with the basic rules of the English language, and is vastly under-referenced to the point of not being trustworthy. Articles like this one are the type that give Wikipedia a bad reputation.
Ira Leviton (
talk)
15:44, 15 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.