The result was keep. Wizardman 15:45, 9 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Wikipedia is not a crystal ball or indiscriminate collection of information. "Articles that present extrapolation, speculation, and "future history" are original research and therefore inappropriate." Opening sentence of the article: "Speculation has begun to take shape over potential nominations." Case closed. Keep verifiable speculation on potential nominees' biographical articles until such time a nomination is actually made. Madcoverboy ( talk) 17:25, 2 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Delete per nom. Speculation-based. Lord Cornwallis ( talk) 18:17, 2 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Wizardman 15:45, 9 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Wikipedia is not a crystal ball or indiscriminate collection of information. "Articles that present extrapolation, speculation, and "future history" are original research and therefore inappropriate." Opening sentence of the article: "Speculation has begun to take shape over potential nominations." Case closed. Keep verifiable speculation on potential nominees' biographical articles until such time a nomination is actually made. Madcoverboy ( talk) 17:25, 2 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Delete per nom. Speculation-based. Lord Cornwallis ( talk) 18:17, 2 May 2009 (UTC) reply