The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Redirect to
Kepala Batas, Penang, which is the district in which this development is located.
This news article suggests that the development will have a population of 50,000 by 2025, which would by that time well and truly merit an article. But I'm loathe to trust the news article: despite being in a fairly reputable newspaper by Malaysian standards, it is a real estate press release. Let's call this one a "not now". If and when the development becomes an established locality, and there is significant coverage in reliable sources, the redirect can be reverted.--
Mkativerata (
talk)
20:39, 21 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion or advertising. This is an advertisement.
WP:Notadvertising. No coverage in multiple independent reliable sources fails GNG. Also fails
WP:NGEO. The only sources are a promotional webpage advertising they are open for business and a questionable news article mentioned above. ---
Steve Quinn (
talk)
05:27, 4 September 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Redirect to
Kepala Batas, Penang, which is the district in which this development is located.
This news article suggests that the development will have a population of 50,000 by 2025, which would by that time well and truly merit an article. But I'm loathe to trust the news article: despite being in a fairly reputable newspaper by Malaysian standards, it is a real estate press release. Let's call this one a "not now". If and when the development becomes an established locality, and there is significant coverage in reliable sources, the redirect can be reverted.--
Mkativerata (
talk)
20:39, 21 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion or advertising. This is an advertisement.
WP:Notadvertising. No coverage in multiple independent reliable sources fails GNG. Also fails
WP:NGEO. The only sources are a promotional webpage advertising they are open for business and a questionable news article mentioned above. ---
Steve Quinn (
talk)
05:27, 4 September 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.