- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Consensus is that the company has not received enough coverage in reliable sources to qualify for a Wikipedia article at this time. North America 1000 00:59, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
- Bamtino ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about a company that made a press release a few weeks ago. Fails WP:ORGDEPTH. - Mr X 17:13, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. - Mr X 17:14, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. - Mr X 17:14, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as there's unlikely enough for a better article yet. SwisterTwister talk 07:19, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as probably to soon. Also Lightning Lab would be a better article to complete where Bamtino could be mentioned at this stage. NealeFamily ( talk) 00:21, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as above, lacks significant worthwhile coverage. Looks promotional, article created by editor whose only edit has been the creation of this article. DerbyCountyinNZ ( Talk Contribs) 03:43, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 21:39, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 21:39, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Consensus is that the company has not received enough coverage in reliable sources to qualify for a Wikipedia article at this time. North America 1000 00:59, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
- Bamtino ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about a company that made a press release a few weeks ago. Fails WP:ORGDEPTH. - Mr X 17:13, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. - Mr X 17:14, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. - Mr X 17:14, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as there's unlikely enough for a better article yet. SwisterTwister talk 07:19, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as probably to soon. Also Lightning Lab would be a better article to complete where Bamtino could be mentioned at this stage. NealeFamily ( talk) 00:21, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as above, lacks significant worthwhile coverage. Looks promotional, article created by editor whose only edit has been the creation of this article. DerbyCountyinNZ ( Talk Contribs) 03:43, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 21:39, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 21:39, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.