The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Nomination withdrawn.
Peridon (
talk) 20:25, 5 May 2012 (UTC)reply
Unreferenced article that seems to be going nowhere. Has been reckoned to pass A7, but I think may fail
WP:CORP. Tagged unreferenced since June 2007, and orphan since February 2009.
Peridon (
talk) 15:38, 5 May 2012 (UTC)reply
Keep I added 6 references in 10 minutes, just using Google News, and just looking for English. It verifies most of the material. As the main firm involved in some very large projects, they're notable The nom could have done the same. DGG (
talk ) 17:20, 5 May 2012 (UTC)reply
Comment I must have looked in the wrong places. Withdrawing.
Peridon (
talk) 20:25, 5 May 2012 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Nomination withdrawn.
Peridon (
talk) 20:25, 5 May 2012 (UTC)reply
Unreferenced article that seems to be going nowhere. Has been reckoned to pass A7, but I think may fail
WP:CORP. Tagged unreferenced since June 2007, and orphan since February 2009.
Peridon (
talk) 15:38, 5 May 2012 (UTC)reply
Keep I added 6 references in 10 minutes, just using Google News, and just looking for English. It verifies most of the material. As the main firm involved in some very large projects, they're notable The nom could have done the same. DGG (
talk ) 17:20, 5 May 2012 (UTC)reply
Comment I must have looked in the wrong places. Withdrawing.
Peridon (
talk) 20:25, 5 May 2012 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.