The result was keep. Cirt ( talk) 00:41, 5 February 2010 (UTC) reply
42 people killed by a hostile army in a war zone is not notable Taivo ( talk) 12:13, 28 January 2010 (UTC) reply
Delete or merge: Even though it's been listed somewhere on a county history or on a monument still doesn't make it notable. It makes it verifiable, but not notable. I am listed in various publications, but that doesn't make me notable--it just makes me verifiable. Wikipedia doesn't give an article to every verifiable fact or event, nor should it. ( Taivo ( talk) 23:54, 27 January 2010 (UTC)) reply
Keep or merge. I don't see how the encyclopedia could be improved by deleting this information. Certainly it needs rewriting; perhaps it could be merged into another article which covers these events more comprehensively.-- Kotniski ( talk) 13:00, 28 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Cirt ( talk) 00:41, 5 February 2010 (UTC) reply
42 people killed by a hostile army in a war zone is not notable Taivo ( talk) 12:13, 28 January 2010 (UTC) reply
Delete or merge: Even though it's been listed somewhere on a county history or on a monument still doesn't make it notable. It makes it verifiable, but not notable. I am listed in various publications, but that doesn't make me notable--it just makes me verifiable. Wikipedia doesn't give an article to every verifiable fact or event, nor should it. ( Taivo ( talk) 23:54, 27 January 2010 (UTC)) reply
Keep or merge. I don't see how the encyclopedia could be improved by deleting this information. Certainly it needs rewriting; perhaps it could be merged into another article which covers these events more comprehensively.-- Kotniski ( talk) 13:00, 28 January 2010 (UTC) reply