From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Steam locomotive components. Since what we have is outsourced we usually redirect instead of merge but perhaps the source that was found during the discussion can support a comment or two? Spartaz Humbug! 05:50, 22 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Backhead

Backhead (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Railway terminology. WP:DICDEF unsourced since 2009. Sandstein 22:13, 14 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Delete Unsourced since creation in 2004. Per nom, not a dictionary of technical terms. Vermont | reply here 22:24, 14 February 2018 (UTC) reply
Merge to Cab (locomotive). Per Slambo Vermont | reply here 00:26, 15 February 2018 (UTC) reply
Merge to Cab (locomotive), because it's a part of a locomotive cab. As to the point of being unreferenced, page 16 of the 1922 Locomotive Cyclopedia of American Practice defines it. I am not adding it to the article right now because of this discussion, and the total amount of the content will fit into the cab article. Slambo (Speak) 23:25, 14 February 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 00:38, 15 February 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 00:38, 15 February 2018 (UTC) reply
How about a merge to both pages? Vermont | reply here 15:49, 15 February 2018 (UTC) reply
No opposition on my part, but this wouldn't be a merger so much as a mere mention of this (outdated) terminology on these pages. I'm indifferent as to where to redirect to. Sandstein 16:21, 15 February 2018 (UTC) reply
It's an American term. Mangoe ( talk) 11:48, 21 February 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Steam locomotive components. Since what we have is outsourced we usually redirect instead of merge but perhaps the source that was found during the discussion can support a comment or two? Spartaz Humbug! 05:50, 22 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Backhead

Backhead (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Railway terminology. WP:DICDEF unsourced since 2009. Sandstein 22:13, 14 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Delete Unsourced since creation in 2004. Per nom, not a dictionary of technical terms. Vermont | reply here 22:24, 14 February 2018 (UTC) reply
Merge to Cab (locomotive). Per Slambo Vermont | reply here 00:26, 15 February 2018 (UTC) reply
Merge to Cab (locomotive), because it's a part of a locomotive cab. As to the point of being unreferenced, page 16 of the 1922 Locomotive Cyclopedia of American Practice defines it. I am not adding it to the article right now because of this discussion, and the total amount of the content will fit into the cab article. Slambo (Speak) 23:25, 14 February 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 00:38, 15 February 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 00:38, 15 February 2018 (UTC) reply
How about a merge to both pages? Vermont | reply here 15:49, 15 February 2018 (UTC) reply
No opposition on my part, but this wouldn't be a merger so much as a mere mention of this (outdated) terminology on these pages. I'm indifferent as to where to redirect to. Sandstein 16:21, 15 February 2018 (UTC) reply
It's an American term. Mangoe ( talk) 11:48, 21 February 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook