The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 18:32, 26 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Non-notable firearm; search in English found no reliable sources. A Portuguese-speaker may be able to help. Created by a
User:Ctway sock.
ansh666 08:23, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
DELETE...Dead end, one of a kind experimental weapons, with limited or no supporting references to establish notability do not meet guidelines.--
RAF910 (
talk) 17:23, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
UY ScutiTalk 17:20, 17 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete Highly obscure, probably just a prototype. --
Mr. Magoo (
talk) 18:59, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom, almost no reliable sources found. -
Liancetalk/
contribs 02:11, 25 February 2016 (UTC)reply
The references have to establish "notably" not just that they were made. In other words...What is it about these guns that merit inclusion on Wikipedia? The answer is nothing. This gun is a dead end. At best a handful of prototypes or production samples were made. The reference that you provided is nothing more than the manufactures advertising brochure, and is more or less a copy of the reference provided in the article. There is nothing to suggest that this gun was ever mass produced or used by anyone.--
RAF910 (
talk) 17:57, 25 February 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 18:32, 26 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Non-notable firearm; search in English found no reliable sources. A Portuguese-speaker may be able to help. Created by a
User:Ctway sock.
ansh666 08:23, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
DELETE...Dead end, one of a kind experimental weapons, with limited or no supporting references to establish notability do not meet guidelines.--
RAF910 (
talk) 17:23, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
UY ScutiTalk 17:20, 17 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete Highly obscure, probably just a prototype. --
Mr. Magoo (
talk) 18:59, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom, almost no reliable sources found. -
Liancetalk/
contribs 02:11, 25 February 2016 (UTC)reply
The references have to establish "notably" not just that they were made. In other words...What is it about these guns that merit inclusion on Wikipedia? The answer is nothing. This gun is a dead end. At best a handful of prototypes or production samples were made. The reference that you provided is nothing more than the manufactures advertising brochure, and is more or less a copy of the reference provided in the article. There is nothing to suggest that this gun was ever mass produced or used by anyone.--
RAF910 (
talk) 17:57, 25 February 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.