- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:33, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- BEAM (Platform) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promotional article created by a CU confirmed sock in violation of the terms of use. PROD was contested by a block evading IP. Article has previously been G11'd under a previous title, but taking it to AfD this time since the language is slightly less glossy-brochure. As a promotional TOU violation, the question of notability doesn't come into play: it has no right to be assessed under that guideline. TonyBallioni ( talk) 05:21, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. AllyD ( talk) 09:11, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. AllyD ( talk) 09:11, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: An article describing a recent start-up's proposition, sourced with routine funding announcements and instances of similarly-worded coverage. I am seeing no evidence of attained notability by WP:NSOFT or WP:GNG. AllyD ( talk) 09:11, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 14:12, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Entirely promotional . I would have used G11, but I respect the nom's decision not to. (I doubt it's notable either, but in the circumstances, that's a relatively less critical failing) DGG ( talk ) 00:57, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:33, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- BEAM (Platform) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promotional article created by a CU confirmed sock in violation of the terms of use. PROD was contested by a block evading IP. Article has previously been G11'd under a previous title, but taking it to AfD this time since the language is slightly less glossy-brochure. As a promotional TOU violation, the question of notability doesn't come into play: it has no right to be assessed under that guideline. TonyBallioni ( talk) 05:21, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. AllyD ( talk) 09:11, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. AllyD ( talk) 09:11, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: An article describing a recent start-up's proposition, sourced with routine funding announcements and instances of similarly-worded coverage. I am seeing no evidence of attained notability by WP:NSOFT or WP:GNG. AllyD ( talk) 09:11, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 14:12, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Entirely promotional . I would have used G11, but I respect the nom's decision not to. (I doubt it's notable either, but in the circumstances, that's a relatively less critical failing) DGG ( talk ) 00:57, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.