- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to BD+03 2562. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:36, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
BD+03 2562 b
- BD+03 2562 b ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This has not received enough coverage to be given an article on its own. Elektricity ( talk) 04:29, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. The Bushranger One ping only 05:38, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. The Bushranger One ping only 05:38, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. No mainstream coverage, one dedicated (to this and one other candidate planet) journal paper and two papers mentioning the parent star. Falls far short of WP:NASTRO. The discovery paper makes the point that this exoplanet is interesting for being found around a low-metallicity giant star but it is hardly unique in that respect and just adds to an intriguing body of evidence. Lithopsian ( talk) 17:45, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Merge to BD+03 2562. - The Bushranger One ping only 06:30, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Merge/redirect Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 15:51, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to BD+03 2562. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:36, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
BD+03 2562 b
- BD+03 2562 b ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This has not received enough coverage to be given an article on its own. Elektricity ( talk) 04:29, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. The Bushranger One ping only 05:38, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. The Bushranger One ping only 05:38, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. No mainstream coverage, one dedicated (to this and one other candidate planet) journal paper and two papers mentioning the parent star. Falls far short of WP:NASTRO. The discovery paper makes the point that this exoplanet is interesting for being found around a low-metallicity giant star but it is hardly unique in that respect and just adds to an intriguing body of evidence. Lithopsian ( talk) 17:45, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Merge to BD+03 2562. - The Bushranger One ping only 06:30, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Merge/redirect Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 15:51, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.