The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep.
John254 00:14, 28 December 2008 (UTC)reply
WP:N, only reliable external source listed is a deleted WordPress blog.
StonerDude420 (
talk) 08:53, 24 December 2008 (UTC)reply
Keep Well established news organization. A merge might be reasonable if a good target is found.
ChildofMidnight (
talk) 18:36, 24 December 2008 (UTC)reply
Keep Looks fairly notable to me. LinguistAtLarge 21:32, 24 December 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep.
John254 00:14, 28 December 2008 (UTC)reply
WP:N, only reliable external source listed is a deleted WordPress blog.
StonerDude420 (
talk) 08:53, 24 December 2008 (UTC)reply
Keep Well established news organization. A merge might be reasonable if a good target is found.
ChildofMidnight (
talk) 18:36, 24 December 2008 (UTC)reply
Keep Looks fairly notable to me. LinguistAtLarge 21:32, 24 December 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.