- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 13:16, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
BAC Group of Companies
- BAC Group of Companies ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NORG. The first inline source does not mention BAC, while the second is of only local importance, and does not establish notability. The non-inline sources are a collection of press releases and other material that does not establish notability. I could find no substantial coverage of this organization. ubiquity ( talk) 18:15, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. The first source is apparently not the source the editor wanted to use - it's this one - but the source he did intend to use is still a press release, so there's nothing there. — Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:40, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, while this looks like a genuine news article to me, it's not enough to establish notability. Huon ( talk) 22:03, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - I removed a load of dross from the original version and tagged it for notability but there has been no improvement since. Velella Velella Talk 22:36, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 05:51, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete and I would've also explored speedy, as there's still nothing minimally convincing for the needed notability. SwisterTwister talk 06:48, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 13:16, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
BAC Group of Companies
- BAC Group of Companies ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NORG. The first inline source does not mention BAC, while the second is of only local importance, and does not establish notability. The non-inline sources are a collection of press releases and other material that does not establish notability. I could find no substantial coverage of this organization. ubiquity ( talk) 18:15, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. The first source is apparently not the source the editor wanted to use - it's this one - but the source he did intend to use is still a press release, so there's nothing there. — Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:40, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, while this looks like a genuine news article to me, it's not enough to establish notability. Huon ( talk) 22:03, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - I removed a load of dross from the original version and tagged it for notability but there has been no improvement since. Velella Velella Talk 22:36, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 05:51, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete and I would've also explored speedy, as there's still nothing minimally convincing for the needed notability. SwisterTwister talk 06:48, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.