From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect. Withdrawn by nominator. Non-admin closure. Safiel ( talk) 01:45, 27 February 2014 (UTC) reply

B3344

B3344 (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An insignificant piece of tarmac; a non-notable minor road. Fails GNG and the article provides no suggestion of significance. Author blocked a PROD. BethNaught ( talk) 17:17, 25 February 2014 (UTC) Change to redirect as below, I was not aware of the list either. BethNaught ( talk) 07:46, 26 February 2014 (UTC) reply

  • Delete. Entirely unremarkable minor road. TheLongTone ( talk) 17:20, 25 February 2014 (UTC)Change to redirect, as below, would have done this rather than RRODing had I known the list existed. TheLongTone ( talk) 00:49, 26 February 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Note: If this were ruled a test article it would be much better to speedy delete it per WP:G2, but I'm not sure if it is. BethNaught ( talk) 17:22, 25 February 2014 (UTC) reply
I'm sure its not, its a serious attempt to create an article. Just unfortunate that there is no appropriate csd tag. There are times one just knows the PROD will be removed with no comment. TheLongTone ( talk) 18:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:11, 25 February 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:11, 25 February 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect. Withdrawn by nominator. Non-admin closure. Safiel ( talk) 01:45, 27 February 2014 (UTC) reply

B3344

B3344 (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An insignificant piece of tarmac; a non-notable minor road. Fails GNG and the article provides no suggestion of significance. Author blocked a PROD. BethNaught ( talk) 17:17, 25 February 2014 (UTC) Change to redirect as below, I was not aware of the list either. BethNaught ( talk) 07:46, 26 February 2014 (UTC) reply

  • Delete. Entirely unremarkable minor road. TheLongTone ( talk) 17:20, 25 February 2014 (UTC)Change to redirect, as below, would have done this rather than RRODing had I known the list existed. TheLongTone ( talk) 00:49, 26 February 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Note: If this were ruled a test article it would be much better to speedy delete it per WP:G2, but I'm not sure if it is. BethNaught ( talk) 17:22, 25 February 2014 (UTC) reply
I'm sure its not, its a serious attempt to create an article. Just unfortunate that there is no appropriate csd tag. There are times one just knows the PROD will be removed with no comment. TheLongTone ( talk) 18:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:11, 25 February 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:11, 25 February 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook