The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
JohnCD (
talk) 20:46, 3 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Non notable Czech parapsychologist, the problem is that no reliable references can be found. Article is original research and the few sources that are on it are all unreliable fringe sources (Michael Talbot) etc.
Goblin Face (
talk) 15:42, 23 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete. No reliable sources.
Xxanthippe (
talk) 02:53, 25 February 2014 (UTC).reply
Delete If the only sources are other fringe sources we won't be able to create a balanced article up to Wikipedia's standards as per
WP:FRINGESimonm223 (
talk) 17:54, 25 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete. Fringe researchers need mainstream sources (covering their work in-depth from the mainstream point of view) to put their work in perspective, per
WP:NPOV and
WP:FRINGE. We don't have such sources in this case. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 20:50, 25 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete, lack of reliable non-fringe sources. --
Randykitty (
talk) 11:12, 26 February 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
JohnCD (
talk) 20:46, 3 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Non notable Czech parapsychologist, the problem is that no reliable references can be found. Article is original research and the few sources that are on it are all unreliable fringe sources (Michael Talbot) etc.
Goblin Face (
talk) 15:42, 23 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete. No reliable sources.
Xxanthippe (
talk) 02:53, 25 February 2014 (UTC).reply
Delete If the only sources are other fringe sources we won't be able to create a balanced article up to Wikipedia's standards as per
WP:FRINGESimonm223 (
talk) 17:54, 25 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete. Fringe researchers need mainstream sources (covering their work in-depth from the mainstream point of view) to put their work in perspective, per
WP:NPOV and
WP:FRINGE. We don't have such sources in this case. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 20:50, 25 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete, lack of reliable non-fringe sources. --
Randykitty (
talk) 11:12, 26 February 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.