The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:31, 17 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep. "Unsourced" is not a reason for deletion, see
WP:RUBBISH; what counts is the existence of sources, see
WP:NEXIST. Being a stub is not a reson for deletion either, see
WP:IMPATIENT. The so-called "overlap with
Sørvágsvatn" is obscure to me, they are distinct natural features, and per
WP:GEOLAND, named natural features are often notable, provided information beyond statistics and coordinates is known to exist. This includes mountains, lakes, streams, islands, etc. A few references to book sources have been added. — SamSailor 22:18, 21 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:41, 24 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep but improve: "Unsourced" is not a reason for deletion but you can by adding refs to the article.
KGirlTrucker81huh?what I'm been doing 17:36, 24 September 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:31, 17 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep. "Unsourced" is not a reason for deletion, see
WP:RUBBISH; what counts is the existence of sources, see
WP:NEXIST. Being a stub is not a reson for deletion either, see
WP:IMPATIENT. The so-called "overlap with
Sørvágsvatn" is obscure to me, they are distinct natural features, and per
WP:GEOLAND, named natural features are often notable, provided information beyond statistics and coordinates is known to exist. This includes mountains, lakes, streams, islands, etc. A few references to book sources have been added. — SamSailor 22:18, 21 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:41, 24 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep but improve: "Unsourced" is not a reason for deletion but you can by adding refs to the article.
KGirlTrucker81huh?what I'm been doing 17:36, 24 September 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.