The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
In my opinion, this article gives you too much detail on Uluben, but gives little evidence on her notability, with only two links, one of which is dead.
Matty.00710:15, 9 July 2013 (UTC)reply
Keep. Not a very good article, but that is not a reason to delete it. I've added a source confirming that she is (or perhaps wa) a member of the Turkish Academy of Sciences, so this clearly meets
WP:ACADEMIC. --
Randykitty (
talk)
12:18, 9 July 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
In my opinion, this article gives you too much detail on Uluben, but gives little evidence on her notability, with only two links, one of which is dead.
Matty.00710:15, 9 July 2013 (UTC)reply
Keep. Not a very good article, but that is not a reason to delete it. I've added a source confirming that she is (or perhaps wa) a member of the Turkish Academy of Sciences, so this clearly meets
WP:ACADEMIC. --
Randykitty (
talk)
12:18, 9 July 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.