This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP.
Postdlf
04:05, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Rejected policy proposal that User:Netoholic nonetheless continues to refer to as though it was authoritative. Should be deleted in order to prevent any such further abuse. LevelCheck 20:36, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Comment Of tangential relevance to this VfD is
this recent arbcom decision on the subject: "The questions raised by
Wikipedia:Meta-templates considered harmful are referred to the Wikipedia
developer committee for their consideration. Pending a decision by the developer committee or their designee the lack of community consensus regarding the matter shall control unless a consensus is reached.". In effect, arbcom has delegated the determination of validity of this proposed policy to the developers rather than just accept consensus. This may be a little
ultra vires for arbcom, but they're not known for their modesty. --
Tony Sidaway|
Talk
23:08, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP.
Postdlf
04:05, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Rejected policy proposal that User:Netoholic nonetheless continues to refer to as though it was authoritative. Should be deleted in order to prevent any such further abuse. LevelCheck 20:36, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Comment Of tangential relevance to this VfD is
this recent arbcom decision on the subject: "The questions raised by
Wikipedia:Meta-templates considered harmful are referred to the Wikipedia
developer committee for their consideration. Pending a decision by the developer committee or their designee the lack of community consensus regarding the matter shall control unless a consensus is reached.". In effect, arbcom has delegated the determination of validity of this proposed policy to the developers rather than just accept consensus. This may be a little
ultra vires for arbcom, but they're not known for their modesty. --
Tony Sidaway|
Talk
23:08, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
reply