The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep Tentative keep: A quick google search shows a large number of non-self published sources (that are admittedly fairly low quality special interest publications)
[1],
[2],
[3],
[4],
[5],
[6]. As notability (artists) failed consensus, the closest guidelines I can see for this subject would be
WP:NMUSIC, which suggest that "Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself" are notable, provided that they are not "Any reprints of press releases, other publications where the musician or ensemble talks about themselves", or "Works consisting merely of trivial coverage, eg booking details", or "Articles in a school or university newspaper (or similar), in most cases.". From this, and from the continuing secondary source coverage of the suspect, I'm tenatively inclined to support a keep for this article, despite the severe apprehensions I have about celebrity and e-fame articles in general.
BrxBrx(
talk)(please reply with {{SUBST:re|BrxBrx}})05:19, 8 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Reply Hi! I felt that the
Wikipedia:Notability (music) was an appropriate guideline for precisely that reason. The other guideline that would apply IMO would be
wp:author, but that guideline is rather sparse. There is no separate guideline for e-famous people yet either, so I just picked the one that seemed closest.
BrxBrx(
talk)(please reply with {{SUBST:re|BrxBrx}})06:16, 8 January 2021 (UTC)reply
you disqualified yourself by pretending that a given subject with significant coverage including the New York Times and Forbes was
poorly sourced. There's really no point at trying to find coverage here since it doesn't matter to you. --
Deansfa (
talk)
14:55, 9 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Weak delete She was only in a few episodes of one season of Chicken Girls, and only one of the stars of this webseries has an article, so this acting role does not establish notability. Forbes names over 900 people to its various 30/30 lists every year, so this does not establish notability either. Nor does having a lot of followers.
Reywas92Talk22:03, 10 January 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep Tentative keep: A quick google search shows a large number of non-self published sources (that are admittedly fairly low quality special interest publications)
[1],
[2],
[3],
[4],
[5],
[6]. As notability (artists) failed consensus, the closest guidelines I can see for this subject would be
WP:NMUSIC, which suggest that "Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself" are notable, provided that they are not "Any reprints of press releases, other publications where the musician or ensemble talks about themselves", or "Works consisting merely of trivial coverage, eg booking details", or "Articles in a school or university newspaper (or similar), in most cases.". From this, and from the continuing secondary source coverage of the suspect, I'm tenatively inclined to support a keep for this article, despite the severe apprehensions I have about celebrity and e-fame articles in general.
BrxBrx(
talk)(please reply with {{SUBST:re|BrxBrx}})05:19, 8 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Reply Hi! I felt that the
Wikipedia:Notability (music) was an appropriate guideline for precisely that reason. The other guideline that would apply IMO would be
wp:author, but that guideline is rather sparse. There is no separate guideline for e-famous people yet either, so I just picked the one that seemed closest.
BrxBrx(
talk)(please reply with {{SUBST:re|BrxBrx}})06:16, 8 January 2021 (UTC)reply
you disqualified yourself by pretending that a given subject with significant coverage including the New York Times and Forbes was
poorly sourced. There's really no point at trying to find coverage here since it doesn't matter to you. --
Deansfa (
talk)
14:55, 9 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Weak delete She was only in a few episodes of one season of Chicken Girls, and only one of the stars of this webseries has an article, so this acting role does not establish notability. Forbes names over 900 people to its various 30/30 lists every year, so this does not establish notability either. Nor does having a lot of followers.
Reywas92Talk22:03, 10 January 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.