The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Weak Keep and Improve The nom is quite correct that this article does not pass GNG as is, but a couple of google searches leads me to believe that sources exist, at least for "Autreat", an annual retreat this organization sponsors (which may suggest the article should be renamed "Autreat" but that's up to article editors). For starters, Slate gives some non-trivial coverage in
this article, citing a printed academic work. The NYT link in the Wiki article is only trivial coverage, but mentions in two major publications based on just a cursory look suggests sources are out there. Improve the article, don't delete. -
Markeer 17:46, 28 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep I added more sources to the article. It passes GNG.
Megalibrarygirl (
talk) 18:28, 1 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep There's significant coverage of ANI in independent sources.
CatPath (
talk) 15:34, 2 March 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Weak Keep and Improve The nom is quite correct that this article does not pass GNG as is, but a couple of google searches leads me to believe that sources exist, at least for "Autreat", an annual retreat this organization sponsors (which may suggest the article should be renamed "Autreat" but that's up to article editors). For starters, Slate gives some non-trivial coverage in
this article, citing a printed academic work. The NYT link in the Wiki article is only trivial coverage, but mentions in two major publications based on just a cursory look suggests sources are out there. Improve the article, don't delete. -
Markeer 17:46, 28 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep I added more sources to the article. It passes GNG.
Megalibrarygirl (
talk) 18:28, 1 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep There's significant coverage of ANI in independent sources.
CatPath (
talk) 15:34, 2 March 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.