- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Nakon 19:15, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Augusto Bedacarratz
- Augusto Bedacarratz ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This person is only notable for his participation in WP:ONEEVENT. KDS4444 ( talk) 11:35, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 17:39, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 17:39, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 17:39, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- There is more to add about this individual. I think the Royal Navy may have found his activities not unnotable. DinosaursLoveExistence ( talk) 09:12, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - this appears to be a clear case of WP:ONEEVENT. Nick-D ( talk) 11:35, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as nothing suggesting the applicable notability and improvements. SwisterTwister talk 05:21, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep ONEEVENT is a requirement to be cautious, not a blanket ban. I would also suggest that this particular event is seen as more important to British editors than those outside. Andy Dingley ( talk) 19:18, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Per Andy Dingley of historical relevance. W C M email 19:34, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment It's worth looking at the Italian article too: [1] Andy Dingley ( talk) 22:07, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Nakon 19:15, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Augusto Bedacarratz
- Augusto Bedacarratz ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This person is only notable for his participation in WP:ONEEVENT. KDS4444 ( talk) 11:35, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 17:39, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 17:39, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 17:39, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- There is more to add about this individual. I think the Royal Navy may have found his activities not unnotable. DinosaursLoveExistence ( talk) 09:12, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - this appears to be a clear case of WP:ONEEVENT. Nick-D ( talk) 11:35, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as nothing suggesting the applicable notability and improvements. SwisterTwister talk 05:21, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep ONEEVENT is a requirement to be cautious, not a blanket ban. I would also suggest that this particular event is seen as more important to British editors than those outside. Andy Dingley ( talk) 19:18, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Per Andy Dingley of historical relevance. W C M email 19:34, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment It's worth looking at the Italian article too: [1] Andy Dingley ( talk) 22:07, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.