From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 15:35, 22 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Atul Singh (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Absolute fluff piece on a non-notable individual. Sources are largely primary and unreliable. Copious amounts of WP:ORIGINALSYN and WP:UNSOURCED material. Fails criteria listed in WP:BIO. — Nearly Headless Nick {c} 11:58, 15 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz ( talk) 12:08, 15 March 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz ( talk) 12:08, 15 March 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz ( talk) 12:08, 15 March 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz ( talk) 12:08, 15 March 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz ( talk) 12:08, 15 March 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - per nom. But interesting side note - much of the article's content comes from a number of user accounts with a similar naming style who have only made edits to this article. I'm going to take a wild guess and say that this article was largely written by its subject. Cosmic Sans ( talk) 14:33, 15 March 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. — Nearly Headless Nick {c} 20:44, 18 March 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 15:35, 22 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Atul Singh (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Absolute fluff piece on a non-notable individual. Sources are largely primary and unreliable. Copious amounts of WP:ORIGINALSYN and WP:UNSOURCED material. Fails criteria listed in WP:BIO. — Nearly Headless Nick {c} 11:58, 15 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz ( talk) 12:08, 15 March 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz ( talk) 12:08, 15 March 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz ( talk) 12:08, 15 March 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz ( talk) 12:08, 15 March 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz ( talk) 12:08, 15 March 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - per nom. But interesting side note - much of the article's content comes from a number of user accounts with a similar naming style who have only made edits to this article. I'm going to take a wild guess and say that this article was largely written by its subject. Cosmic Sans ( talk) 14:33, 15 March 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. — Nearly Headless Nick {c} 20:44, 18 March 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook