The result was speedy keep, nomination withdrawn ~ ct. e 22:00, 10 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Nomination withdrawn I'll work on this article myself and try to improve it. No basis in history. Seems like a
vanity page and It does not satisfy
WP:OR or
WP:RS. Specifically, even the
Samkhyas and
Mimamsakas believed in gods (although they may not have believed in a creator god). They accepted the
Vedas which speak of gods. The gods were worshipped during Samkhya and Mimamsa times too. The first "Hindu" who might be called a proper athiest who did not worship any god may be
Savarkar, but even that is not absolutely conclusive. Look at
this and the
reply. Looks like some nationalists are out to distort Hinduism. Wikipedia is not a
soapbox for such views. But still, I would have no problems with
Atheist Hindus if the present article is moved there.
Babub→
Talk
19:04, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
reply
Babub→ Talk 15:28, 10 September 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep, nomination withdrawn ~ ct. e 22:00, 10 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Nomination withdrawn I'll work on this article myself and try to improve it. No basis in history. Seems like a
vanity page and It does not satisfy
WP:OR or
WP:RS. Specifically, even the
Samkhyas and
Mimamsakas believed in gods (although they may not have believed in a creator god). They accepted the
Vedas which speak of gods. The gods were worshipped during Samkhya and Mimamsa times too. The first "Hindu" who might be called a proper athiest who did not worship any god may be
Savarkar, but even that is not absolutely conclusive. Look at
this and the
reply. Looks like some nationalists are out to distort Hinduism. Wikipedia is not a
soapbox for such views. But still, I would have no problems with
Atheist Hindus if the present article is moved there.
Babub→
Talk
19:04, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
reply
Babub→ Talk 15:28, 10 September 2006 (UTC) reply