The result was No consensus, default to keep. Several users agree that Dodgson's proposed method should be documented somewhere on Wikipedia. There is also agreement that Smith's interpretation and coining of the term "asset voting" is not widely recognized, being mentioned only in self-published materials. However, since Smith's work is not the only analysis of Hodgson's voting system, there is sufficient basis for an article describing the system itself. Concerns over promoting Smith's neologisms could be addressed by renaming the article or merging its text to a fuller exploration of Dodgson's work in the field. ˉˉ anetode ╦╩ 01:52, 4 June 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete. Original research. Neologism. Yellowbeard ( talk) 13:13, 27 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was No consensus, default to keep. Several users agree that Dodgson's proposed method should be documented somewhere on Wikipedia. There is also agreement that Smith's interpretation and coining of the term "asset voting" is not widely recognized, being mentioned only in self-published materials. However, since Smith's work is not the only analysis of Hodgson's voting system, there is sufficient basis for an article describing the system itself. Concerns over promoting Smith's neologisms could be addressed by renaming the article or merging its text to a fuller exploration of Dodgson's work in the field. ˉˉ anetode ╦╩ 01:52, 4 June 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete. Original research. Neologism. Yellowbeard ( talk) 13:13, 27 May 2008 (UTC) reply