The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 09:14, 22 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Aspen Heights (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deprodded without rationale or improvement. Another non-notable development project. No indication of notability. Searches turned up no in-depth sourcing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:15, 14 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:16, 14 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:16, 14 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 18:05, 14 August 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete - Run of the mill urban development project. Carrite ( talk) 00:12, 15 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:49, 15 August 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.