The result was delete. The Helpful One 12:05, 3 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Notability not established regarding the organization; the article also contains unreferenced materials; advertising or unnecessary promotion of a group; many of the "sources" are broken links. There are far too many fringe and non-notable paranormal investigation "organizations" or groups that contain not even a trace amount of notability or claim to fame -- and having a mention in a news article or magazine does not make one notable. seicer | talk | contribs 05:27, 24 December 2008 (UTC) reply
I am also nominating Charles Goh ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) as his biographical entry does not explicitly state why he is notable. Much of the content derived on the biographical page is copied from the Asia Paranormal Investigators page. seicer | talk | contribs 05:31, 24 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. The Helpful One 12:05, 3 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Notability not established regarding the organization; the article also contains unreferenced materials; advertising or unnecessary promotion of a group; many of the "sources" are broken links. There are far too many fringe and non-notable paranormal investigation "organizations" or groups that contain not even a trace amount of notability or claim to fame -- and having a mention in a news article or magazine does not make one notable. seicer | talk | contribs 05:27, 24 December 2008 (UTC) reply
I am also nominating Charles Goh ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) as his biographical entry does not explicitly state why he is notable. Much of the content derived on the biographical page is copied from the Asia Paranormal Investigators page. seicer | talk | contribs 05:31, 24 December 2008 (UTC) reply