The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment "Unauthorised" is not an issue here: there are no "authorised" articles. And if there is indeed incorrect information, that is a matter for normal editing, though an editor with a
WP:COI should propose any corrections on the article Talk page rather than edit directly. That said, there is a question here as to whether the firm meets
WP:CORPDEPTH.
AllyD (
talk)
06:51, 10 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete Comment - While having "Unauthorised" information is not a valid reason for deletion, I could not find enough reliable coverage for the organization (Google News only gives me one link, and it's a press release).Narutolovehinata5tccsdnew09:43, 13 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Weak keep - there are sources. The Report: Bahrain 2009 - Page 75 Oxford Business Group is a reliable source: "The takaful segment also recently saw a new player when Asia Capital Reinsurance for ReTakaful was granted a licence. The company is a subsidiary of ACR ReTakaful Holdings, itself a joint venture between Dubai Islamic Investment Group ..." and (2) Gulf Business - Volume 13 2008 Page 14 "ACR Retakaful Holdings Limited is a joint venture between Dubai Group, Khazanah Nasional Bhd, the investment arm of the Malaysian Government and Singapore- based Asia Capital Reinsurance (ACR). The deal was completed through ..."
In ictu oculi (
talk)
05:48, 16 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Sorry about that, "Asia Capital Re" does give me more hits for some reason. Abbreviating Reinsurance as "Re" is somewhat weird to me though. As such, I've changed my !vote to Keep.
Narutolovehinata5tccsdnew10:36, 17 January 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment "Unauthorised" is not an issue here: there are no "authorised" articles. And if there is indeed incorrect information, that is a matter for normal editing, though an editor with a
WP:COI should propose any corrections on the article Talk page rather than edit directly. That said, there is a question here as to whether the firm meets
WP:CORPDEPTH.
AllyD (
talk)
06:51, 10 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete Comment - While having "Unauthorised" information is not a valid reason for deletion, I could not find enough reliable coverage for the organization (Google News only gives me one link, and it's a press release).Narutolovehinata5tccsdnew09:43, 13 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Weak keep - there are sources. The Report: Bahrain 2009 - Page 75 Oxford Business Group is a reliable source: "The takaful segment also recently saw a new player when Asia Capital Reinsurance for ReTakaful was granted a licence. The company is a subsidiary of ACR ReTakaful Holdings, itself a joint venture between Dubai Islamic Investment Group ..." and (2) Gulf Business - Volume 13 2008 Page 14 "ACR Retakaful Holdings Limited is a joint venture between Dubai Group, Khazanah Nasional Bhd, the investment arm of the Malaysian Government and Singapore- based Asia Capital Reinsurance (ACR). The deal was completed through ..."
In ictu oculi (
talk)
05:48, 16 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Sorry about that, "Asia Capital Re" does give me more hits for some reason. Abbreviating Reinsurance as "Re" is somewhat weird to me though. As such, I've changed my !vote to Keep.
Narutolovehinata5tccsdnew10:36, 17 January 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.