The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete A
sitio is too small to satisfy
WP:GEOLAND and be automatically notable, being a subdision of a
barangay. Such subdivisions should "be considered notable on a case-by-case basis, given non-trivial coverage in multiple, independent reliable sources". I don't see
WP:SIGCOV here. A merge to
Kapayapaan Village, Canlubang, the barangay of which it forms part might be merited, but that's a redirect. --
Pontificalibus05:22, 9 May 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete -
WP:GEOLAND says that places must meet
WP:GNG and have "non-trivial coverage in multiple, independent reliable sources" - as the one reference is an unreliable places of interest website (which includes a 7-Eleven in the list), the article does not meet the notability guideline, therefore, delete -
Epinoia (
talk)
02:04, 12 May 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete. The single keep !vote here points to
WP:GEOLAND as the only justification for this article's subject's notability. As a sitio, which is not a legally recognized administrative subdivision in the Philippines, Asia-1 falls under the "populated places without legal recognition" category which means we should evaluate this under
WP:GNG, which it fails to meet. —
seav (
talk)
13:14, 14 May 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete A
sitio is too small to satisfy
WP:GEOLAND and be automatically notable, being a subdision of a
barangay. Such subdivisions should "be considered notable on a case-by-case basis, given non-trivial coverage in multiple, independent reliable sources". I don't see
WP:SIGCOV here. A merge to
Kapayapaan Village, Canlubang, the barangay of which it forms part might be merited, but that's a redirect. --
Pontificalibus05:22, 9 May 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete -
WP:GEOLAND says that places must meet
WP:GNG and have "non-trivial coverage in multiple, independent reliable sources" - as the one reference is an unreliable places of interest website (which includes a 7-Eleven in the list), the article does not meet the notability guideline, therefore, delete -
Epinoia (
talk)
02:04, 12 May 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete. The single keep !vote here points to
WP:GEOLAND as the only justification for this article's subject's notability. As a sitio, which is not a legally recognized administrative subdivision in the Philippines, Asia-1 falls under the "populated places without legal recognition" category which means we should evaluate this under
WP:GNG, which it fails to meet. —
seav (
talk)
13:14, 14 May 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.