From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MelanieN ( talk) 22:26, 11 June 2022 (UTC) reply

Ashwini Upadhyay

Ashwini Upadhyay (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPOL. Rest everything WP:MILL. Hence, calling for an AfD discussion. - Hatchens ( talk) 08:51, 18 May 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 04:14, 26 May 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Curbon7 ( talk) 19:57, 2 June 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Keep – Per a source review, the subject meets WP:BASIC. It is not necessary to meet both WP:BASIC and WP:NPOL. North America 1000 02:45, 10 June 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. I see nothing in that article to indicate that this person had a real impact on anything covered in there. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 06:50, 11 June 2022 (UTC) reply
@ Doczilla: Your personal opinions about whether or not the subject has made significant impacts is not a guideline-based rationale for deletion. For example, if this type of subjective proclamation were to become policy, we could then delete thousands of various articles about flowers, because flowers often don't make significant impacts that humans notice. North America 1000 15:32, 11 June 2022 (UTC) reply
  • If he were run-of-the-mill, as the nomination asserts, why are there all these articles like these [1], [2] about how unusual it is that he's filed so many PILs? The only language I speak that is commonly spoken in India, out of roughly 1000, is English. I see lots of news articles that discuss him. Who knows how much stuff is available if I spoke some other languages such as Hindi, Urdu, etc. This is in-depth stuff that meets WP:SIGCOV. These are independent, secondary, reliable sources. Beccaynr posted a bunch of them above. He meets WP:BASIC, he meets the general notability guideline. Keep Jacona ( talk) 19:10, 11 June 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MelanieN ( talk) 22:26, 11 June 2022 (UTC) reply

Ashwini Upadhyay

Ashwini Upadhyay (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPOL. Rest everything WP:MILL. Hence, calling for an AfD discussion. - Hatchens ( talk) 08:51, 18 May 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 04:14, 26 May 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Curbon7 ( talk) 19:57, 2 June 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Keep – Per a source review, the subject meets WP:BASIC. It is not necessary to meet both WP:BASIC and WP:NPOL. North America 1000 02:45, 10 June 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. I see nothing in that article to indicate that this person had a real impact on anything covered in there. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 06:50, 11 June 2022 (UTC) reply
@ Doczilla: Your personal opinions about whether or not the subject has made significant impacts is not a guideline-based rationale for deletion. For example, if this type of subjective proclamation were to become policy, we could then delete thousands of various articles about flowers, because flowers often don't make significant impacts that humans notice. North America 1000 15:32, 11 June 2022 (UTC) reply
  • If he were run-of-the-mill, as the nomination asserts, why are there all these articles like these [1], [2] about how unusual it is that he's filed so many PILs? The only language I speak that is commonly spoken in India, out of roughly 1000, is English. I see lots of news articles that discuss him. Who knows how much stuff is available if I spoke some other languages such as Hindi, Urdu, etc. This is in-depth stuff that meets WP:SIGCOV. These are independent, secondary, reliable sources. Beccaynr posted a bunch of them above. He meets WP:BASIC, he meets the general notability guideline. Keep Jacona ( talk) 19:10, 11 June 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook