The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanztalk 02:08, 17 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete. A soldier killed in battle after destroying one tank. Not notable per Wikipedia guidelines.
WWGB (
talk) 02:21, 12 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Keep He was the commander of a unit, he was one of the most notable figures killed in the recent Gaza conflict, and a search reveals that his name comes up several times.
PatGallacher (
talk) 02:25, 12 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Weak Delete. I don't know. He and many other guys were involved in the Conflict, but he could be notable. A search makes me lean to keep, but small volume deters me.--
Riotrocket8676You gotta problem with that? 02:39, 12 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete. A total of eleven Google hits, all either unreliable sources or trivial mentions. This is a textbook example of the difference between significant coverage and brief, non-notable references.
Graymornings(talk) 02:59, 12 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete. Google shows only the one PFLP announcement in different languages. Nothing in books. How many millions of people have died for their cause throughout history? Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It cannot list them all.
Aymatth2 (
talk) 03:02, 12 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete - Non-notable, too few secondary sources to pass. Grsz11 00:28, 17 February 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanztalk 02:08, 17 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete. A soldier killed in battle after destroying one tank. Not notable per Wikipedia guidelines.
WWGB (
talk) 02:21, 12 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Keep He was the commander of a unit, he was one of the most notable figures killed in the recent Gaza conflict, and a search reveals that his name comes up several times.
PatGallacher (
talk) 02:25, 12 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Weak Delete. I don't know. He and many other guys were involved in the Conflict, but he could be notable. A search makes me lean to keep, but small volume deters me.--
Riotrocket8676You gotta problem with that? 02:39, 12 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete. A total of eleven Google hits, all either unreliable sources or trivial mentions. This is a textbook example of the difference between significant coverage and brief, non-notable references.
Graymornings(talk) 02:59, 12 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete. Google shows only the one PFLP announcement in different languages. Nothing in books. How many millions of people have died for their cause throughout history? Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It cannot list them all.
Aymatth2 (
talk) 03:02, 12 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete - Non-notable, too few secondary sources to pass. Grsz11 00:28, 17 February 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.