The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Joyous! |
Talk 01:06, 1 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Does not seem to meet the
WP:ORG notability criteria
Domdeparis (
talk) 09:46, 23 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete, per nom. Never heard of this person/company.
VegasCasinoKid (
talk) 10:28, 23 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Can you show me the policy that states your own ignorance of a topic equates to it not being notable. Thanks. LugnutsPrecious bodily fluids 18:33, 23 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete Of the three sources one is promotional and the other only mentions this company in passing. This is not the level of sourcing needed to show notability.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 05:17, 24 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete Nothing in news or newspapers, just commercial links on the net.
Alaney2k (
talk) 17:55, 29 November 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Joyous! |
Talk 01:06, 1 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Does not seem to meet the
WP:ORG notability criteria
Domdeparis (
talk) 09:46, 23 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete, per nom. Never heard of this person/company.
VegasCasinoKid (
talk) 10:28, 23 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Can you show me the policy that states your own ignorance of a topic equates to it not being notable. Thanks. LugnutsPrecious bodily fluids 18:33, 23 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete Of the three sources one is promotional and the other only mentions this company in passing. This is not the level of sourcing needed to show notability.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 05:17, 24 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete Nothing in news or newspapers, just commercial links on the net.
Alaney2k (
talk) 17:55, 29 November 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.