- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WP:SNOW Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 20:06, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Ashish Chanchlani
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ashish Chanchlani ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The subject of article lacks WP:NN. Being merely a YouTuber doesn't prove his notability. The article does not cite any independent coverage in reliable sources Neurofreak ( talk)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 14:29, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 14:29, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Sources seem to give only trivial coverage -- Ab207 ( talk) 16:41, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom fails WP:GNG . Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 04:31, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
- Weak keep Has a large following on youtube, passing coverage in newspapers of record. Oaktree b ( talk) 02:39, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete – articles about YouTubers are often created with very flimsy sourcing and quite a bit of fluff added by fans (or by the individual's marketing people). Here, the sourcing consists of trivial mentions and press releases (I have just removed four non-RS sources which were added a couple of days ago; they actually made it more clear that he is not notable.) -- bonadea contributions talk 11:11, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:GNG. Bmf 051 ( talk) 12:31, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete as per WP:GNG. All mentions within the article's sources are trivial. Aguy777 ( talk) 20:07, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: subject fails to meet WP:GNG at this time. Jokolis ( talk) 12:24, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: Large following but no significant coverage. Delete for now. - Harsh ( talk) 14:19, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WP:SNOW Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 20:06, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Ashish Chanchlani
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ashish Chanchlani ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The subject of article lacks WP:NN. Being merely a YouTuber doesn't prove his notability. The article does not cite any independent coverage in reliable sources Neurofreak ( talk)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 14:29, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 14:29, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Sources seem to give only trivial coverage -- Ab207 ( talk) 16:41, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom fails WP:GNG . Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 04:31, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
- Weak keep Has a large following on youtube, passing coverage in newspapers of record. Oaktree b ( talk) 02:39, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete – articles about YouTubers are often created with very flimsy sourcing and quite a bit of fluff added by fans (or by the individual's marketing people). Here, the sourcing consists of trivial mentions and press releases (I have just removed four non-RS sources which were added a couple of days ago; they actually made it more clear that he is not notable.) -- bonadea contributions talk 11:11, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:GNG. Bmf 051 ( talk) 12:31, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete as per WP:GNG. All mentions within the article's sources are trivial. Aguy777 ( talk) 20:07, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: subject fails to meet WP:GNG at this time. Jokolis ( talk) 12:24, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: Large following but no significant coverage. Delete for now. - Harsh ( talk) 14:19, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.